Legal Action News

Your news source for lawsuits and other civil legal matters

Legal Action Recently...

April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004


Legal Action News RSS Feed
RSS Feed



 

US Justice Department Moves to Dismiss Lawsuit Against Xelan and Doctors Benefit

20 December 2004

The United States Department of Justice on Friday (December 17, 2004) asked the Federal District Court in San Diego to dismiss without prejudice its lawsuit against xelan and Doctors Benefit Insurance Company, companies that provide financial planning and insurance for
health care professionals.

Last month, in a widely publicized and rare move, the Government sought and obtained, without a hearing, an order freezing all of the assets of xelan and Doctors Benefit, and appointing a temporary receiver. After securing the temporary restraining order, the Government issued a press release accusing the defendants of operating fraudulent tax reduction schemes, and suggesting that doctors contact the receiver to learn how to file claims against the companies.

Nearly a month later (December 3), the Federal District Court in San Diego conducted a full hearing on the Justice Department's application for a preliminary injunction, pending trial of the lawsuit. After hearing all arguments, the Court ruled that the Government had not demonstrated that it was likely to prevail in the case, one of the prerequisites for granting such
relief. At that time, the Court also denied the Government's request for a preliminary injunction, dissolved the freeze of assets and dismissed the receiver.

Last Wednesday , the Court issued its written opinion, in which it found that the government made no showing that xelan violated the tax laws, no showing that assets seized were traceable to criminal activity, no showing of asset dissipation or of an alleged Ponzi scheme, and no showing that the tax implications of any xelan product were mischaracterized in the marketing.

DBIC and its predecessor have been writing supplemental disability insurance since 1995. At the hearing on December 3, DBIC presented opinions from five actuarial firms and two law firms that had previously reviewed DBIC's insurance, each statig unequivocally that the disability insurance was in fact "true" insurance and satisfied all tests for what constituted insurance.

Source: PR Newswire


All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.

 
Law News



A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z