Legal Action News

Your news source for lawsuits and other civil legal matters

Legal Action Recently...

April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004


Legal Action News RSS Feed
RSS Feed



 

U.S. Supreme Court Case Could Have Major Impact on Software and Business-Method Patents, Wolf Greenfield Says

2 November 2005

The Supreme Court's decision to accept a
patent-infringement suit regarding a system for diagnosing a vitamin
deficiency related to heart attacks, strokes, and dementia "opens the door
for the court to break more than 20 years' silence about limitations on
what subjects can be patented," says James Foster, a litigator with the
intellectual property law firm of Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C. "This
seemingly narrow case could result in the Court overturning two decades of
precedent and restricting the ability of inventors to protect software
products or business methods."

In the early 1980s, the Supreme Court ruled that "laws of nature, natural
phenomena, and abstract ideas" are not patentable, but "an application of a
law of nature or mathematical formula...may well be deserving of patent
protection."

The case the Court accepted on Oct. 31, Laboratory Corp. of America
Holdings v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc., involves a method for detecting
vitamin B12 deficiencies. The inventors had discovered a correlation
between the level of another substance in the body (homocysteine) and a
deficiency in vitamin B12. The test for that substance was already in
existence, but the patent would seem to bar anyone who conducted that test
from using the result to deduce there was a vitamin B12 deficiency.

"The Supreme Court's decision to take the case is surprising, particularly
since it has declined to hear similar past cases," Foster said. Even the
U.S. Solicitor General's office recommended denying the appeal.

The court is likely to hear the case sometime early in 2006 and publish its
decision later in the year.

Wolf Greenfield, Boston, is one of New England's largest and oldest
intellectual property law firms, serving companies that make everything
from snowboards to biotech drugs to electronics to water-purification
systems--plus universities and research centers. Practice areas:
biotechnology, chemical, electrical & computer technologies, IP
transactions, litigation, mechanical, trademark and copyright, including
Internet issues. Its experts can comment on any intellectual property
issue, including recent federal court decisions, lawsuits, patent issues in
technology and biotech, trademark and copyright issues in any industry.
Web: www.wolfgreenfield.com



Contact:
Henry Stimpson
Stimpson Communications
508-647-0705
Email Contact
SOURCE: Wolf Greenfield

Source: Marketwire


All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.


Related Articles


 
Law News



A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z