Shareholder Class Action Filed Against Marvell Technology Group Ltd. By The Law Firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP
18 October 2006 The following statement was issued today by the law firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP: Notice is hereby given that a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of all common stock purchasers of Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (Nasdaq: MRVL) ("Marvell" or the "Company") from February 24, 2005 through October 2, 2006, inclusive (the "Class Period"). If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP (Darren J. Check, Esq. or Richard A. Maniskas, Esq.) toll-free at 1-888-299-7706 or 1-610-667-7706, or via e-mail at info@sbclasslaw.com. The complaint charges Marvell and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. More specifically, the Complaint alleges that the Company failed to disclose and misrepresented the following material adverse facts which were known to defendants or recklessly disregarded by them: (1) that Marvell purposely concealed the true dates of stock option grants; (2) that the Company's financial statements were presented in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; (3) that the Company lacked the necessary personnel and controls to issue accurate financial reports and projections; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Marvell's financial results were materially overstated at all relevant times and the Company's statements regarding its prospects were lacking in any reasonable basis when made. On July 5, 2006, before the market opened, Marvell shocked investors when the Company announced that it had received a letter of informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain documents relating to the Company's stock option grants and practices, and a grand jury subpoena from the office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California requesting substantially similar documents. On this news, shares of Marvell dropped $3.53, or 7.9 percent, to close, on July 5, 2006, at $41.31 per share, on heavy trading volume. On October 2, 2006, after the market closed, Marvell further stunned investors when the Company announced that it would restate historical financial statements to record additional non-cash charges for stock-based compensation expense related to certain past option grants. The Company reported that the financial statements and all earnings press releases and similar communications issued by the Company relating to periods beginning on or after its initial public offering in June 2000 should no longer be relied upon. On this news, shares of Marvell shed an additional $2.29, or 12.0 percent, to close, on October 3, 2006, at $16.80 per share, on unusually heavy trading volume. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of class members and is represented by the law firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, which prosecutes class actions in both state and federal courts throughout the country. Schiffrin & Barroway is a driving force behind corporate governance reform, and has recovered billions of dollars on behalf of institutional and individual investors from the United States and around the world. For more information about Schiffrin & Barroway, or to sign up to participate in this action online, please visit http://www.sbclasslaw.com. If you are a member of the class described above, you may, not later than December 5, 2006, move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff of the class, if you so choose. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member's claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as "lead plaintiff." Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain Schiffrin & Barroway, or other counsel of your choice, to serve as your counsel in this action. CONTACT: Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP Darren J. Check, Esq. Richard A. Maniskas, Esq. 280 King of Prussia Road Radnor, PA 19087 1-888-299-7706 (toll-free) or 1-610-667-7706 Or by e-mail at info@sbclasslaw.com
Source: prnewswire
All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.
Related Articles
- Brower Piven Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
18 October 2006
- Lorenzo Trujillo, Assistant Dean, University of Colorado Law School, Appointed New HNBA General Counsel
18 October 2006
- Law Society Tribunal Decisions
18 October 2006
- Hoguet Newman & Regal Joins NAMWOLF as New Law Firm Member
13 October 2006
- NAMWOLF Welcomes Women-owned Law Firm Neal & McDevitt, LLC as New Member
13 October 2006
- NAMWOLF Welcomes Minority-owned Law Firm Sanchez & Amador LLP as Law Firm Member
12 October 2006
- Fields & Brown, LLC Joins NAMWOLF as New Law Firm Member
12 October 2006
- Pennsylvania Attorney General Corbett to Broadcast Live Via Internet and Satellite to Schools Statewide for Kickoff of 'Operation Safe Surf'
11 October 2006
- Top Personal Injury Law Firm in Santa Cruz, CA, Adds Two Partners.
11 October 2006
- NAMWOLF Lauds Law Firm Member Andrea M. Buford's and Blonde Grayson Hall's Article Confronting Corporate America's Lack of Retention of Minority-owned
11 October 2006
- Department of Justice Announces Over $1 Million in Awards to Enforce Underage Drinking Law
11 October 2006
- UPDATE: Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty to Announce Formation of Procurement Fraud Task Force
11 October 2006
- Gold Rock Holdings, Inc. Announces New Agreement With SEC Attorney Representation
11 October 2006
- Leading Restructuring and Insolvency Lawyer Sheryl E. Seigel Joins Lang Michener LLP
10 October 2006
- Major U.S. Law Firms Spend Almost $50,000 in Overhauling Their Web Sites, According to The Survey of Law Firm E-Marketing Practices
10 October 2006
|