Seven Counties Dismissed From California Voters Lawsuit to Block Use or Purchase of Electronic Voting Machines
28 April 2006 California Voters marked their latest legal action today by lauding officials in seven California counties for their commitments to use or switch to all paper balloting rather than electronic voting systems. The Counties of Humboldt, Marin, Placer, San Luis Obispo, Trinity, Tulare, and Santa Barbara were dismissed today from the California Voters Lawsuit (Holder v. McPherson), supported by Voter Action, and filed in San Francisco Superior Court last month. The suit seeks to nullify Secretary of State Bruce McPherson's "conditional" certification authorizing purchase of the Diebold TSx electronic voting system -- which has a history of security, verifiability, and disability access problems -- for use in California elections. "We applaud the counties leading California "back to the future," by selecting verifiable, all paper balloting over electronic voting systems with significant security problems, and the risk of fraud and vote manipulation," said Lowell Finley, Esq., co-director of Voter Action, and co-counsel for the plaintiffs in the California Voters Lawsuit. "These counties appreciate the importance of transparency and verifiability in clean elections. Diebold TSx electronic voting machines contain technology that is easily hacked and nearly impossible to audit or recount, and which is illegal under the California Elections Code." "These California counties have made the right decision not to use touch-screen systems that put election integrity at risk and fail to accommodate voters with a range of disabilities as required by law," said John Eichhorst, co-counsel for the plaintiffs in the California Voter's Lawsuit, and a partner in the San Francisco law firm, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, "No county benefits from risking election funds on expensive electronic voting systems that have acknowledged vulnerability and accessibility problems and fall short of satisfying legal requirements." "Voters concerned with the integrity of our elections are gaining tremendous traction and we are pleased to be supporting them in California and in similar efforts in New York, Pennsylvania, Arizona and other states," said Holly Jacobson, Co-director of Voter Action. The California Voters lawsuit was filed with support from Voter Action, a non-profit organization providing legal, research, and logistical support for grassroots efforts to ensure the integrity of elections in the United States. With members across the country, Voter Action recently led successful litigation in New Mexico to block purchase and use of the types of voting machines that are most error prone and vulnerable to tampering. For additional information, please visit http://www.voteraction.org.
Source: prnewswire
All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.
Related Articles
- Lawsuit Funding Network, Inc. Offers More Funding Options For Plaintiffs
27 April 2006
- Michigan Attorney General Cox Announces $1.5 Million Settlement With Wal-Mart Over Item Pricing Claims
25 April 2006
- Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP, Representing Investors Who Purchased Lipman Electronic Engineering, Ltd., Announces Class Action Lawsuit and Seeks to Re
25 April 2006
- Schatz & Nobel, P.C. Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Fairfax Financial Holdings, Ltd. -- FFH
25 April 2006
- Schatz & Nobel, P.C. Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Newpark Resources, Inc. -- NR
25 April 2006
- Vermont Church Settles Abuse Lawsuit
24 April 2006
- Notice to All Current and Former Kiewit Employees with Concentrated Positions In Level 3 Communications From the Securities Arbitration Law Firm of Kl
23 April 2006
- Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP, Representing Investors Who Purchased Newpark Resources, Inc., Announces Class Action Lawsuit and Seeks to Recover Losses
23 April 2006
- Prepared Remarks of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales at the National Crime Victims' Rights Week Awards Ceremony
23 April 2006
- Pansy Speak: Learning lessons from tragedy
23 April 2006
- Smith & Smith LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit against PHH Corporation -- PHH
21 April 2006
- Baptist Church, Represented by King & Spalding and ACLU, Files Federal Lawsuit to Strike Ordinance on Religious Grounds
21 April 2006
- Notice to All Merrill Lynch Customers from the Securities Arbitration Law Firm of Klayman & Toskes, P.A. -- OPWV, QKKAQ
21 April 2006
- Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox Warns of Internet Dangers
21 April 2006
- Smith & Smith LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. -- NATR
20 April 2006
|