NICKEL Ltd Initiates Third Suit, Against PURE BIOSCIENCE (PURE) Seeking Declaratory Judgments Including as Relates to Its Exclusive Rights to the Axen
7 January 2006 NICKEL LTD – today announced that it had filed an Arbitration proceeding with the American Arbitration Association - International Division in New York against PURE BIOSCIENCE (Formerly INNOVATIVE MEDICAL SERVICES "IMS"). The proceeding will be conducted in Stockholm, Sweden. The complaint brought under an Umbrella Agreement signed between the parties, seeks declaratory judgments against PURE, declaring : 1. that Nickel has fully performed under the contract, and is entitled to delivery by Pure of 5% of its fully diluted outstanding shares in registered freely tradable shares at a price of $0.0001 per share. 2. that Nickel has, under Article VII of the Umbrella Agreement the exclusive right to use and develop for sale the Axen product in Europe, the United States, Mexico, and Canada, in disinfectant, sanitation, and cleansing products and to receive an accounting and remittance of 15% for any direct sales by Pure. 3. that under the Umbrella Agreement, arbitration in Sweden, is the sole authorized forum for the adjudication of any claim. 4. that Sections 10.19 and Section 10.20 of the Umbrella Agreement are valid and enforceable obligations of the parties and consequently, that PURE is obligated to the payment of all costs and attorney's fees incurred by Nickel in relation to all proceedings brought by, or necessitated by Pure in the US. 5. that all incidental and direct costs and damages of the this action including all attorneys fees are the direct obligation of and to be paid by Pure. Attorneys for Nickel stated : «Pure Press Releases and SEC filings, indicate that Pure has entered into agreements with CIBA, Therapeutics, Envirodine, EnvirOx L.L.C, Wallmart, Home Depot and other companies to exploit Axen, an exploitation reserved to Nickel under contract. Pure has also, brought actions in the United States against Nickel and / or its representatives, officers, agents, suppliers etc as for which it is under contract, liable to pay all costs and attorney fees. Lastly, on March 11, 2003 Pure's failed to deliver to Nickel the 5% of its outstanding freely tradable common shares as it was contractually obligated to do." Pure's admission of its multi-million dollar contractual liability to Nickel appears in SEC filings – see 10QSB 17 March, 2003 and 10QSB 16 June 2003. This Arbitration proceeding is the third action brought against PURE. Two prior ongoing suits seek direct contractual damages exceeding $ 47 million. ABOUT NICKEL LTD Nickel Ltd is an investor in intellectual properties, product engineering and marketing. Safe Harbor Statement This press release includes statements that may constitute "forward-looking" statements, usually containing the words "believe", "estimate", "project", "expect" or similar expressions. These statements are made, to the extent relevant, pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements inherently involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that would cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, acceptance of the Company's current and future products and services in the marketplace, the ability of the Company to develop effective new products and receive regulatory approvals of such products, competitive factors, dependence upon third-party vendors, and other risks. By making these forward-looking statements, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this release.
Source: emediawire
All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.
Related Articles
- PROCTER & GAMBLE PHARMACEUTICALS AND SANOFI-AVENTIS US LLC FILE LAWSUIT AGAINST ROCHE PHARMACEUTICALS AND GLAXOSMITHKLINE
6 January 2006
- MEMC Conducts Seizure and Files Suit Against Soitec for Patent Infringement
1 January 2006
- Smith & Smith LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Diebold, Incorporated -- DBD
1 January 2006
- Federman & Sherwood Announces That a Securities Class Action Lawsuit Was Filed Against SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc.
25 December 2005
- Lawsuit Filed by Source Direct Holdings Against Integritas, Inc.
25 December 2005
- Law Offices of Brodsky & Smith, LLC Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Certain Officers and Directors of Northwest Airlines Corporation.
25 December 2005
- Federal Judge Finds New Law No Bar to New York City's Lawsuit Against the Gun Industry
3 December 2005
- Shareholder Class Action Filed Against Blockbuster Inc. by the Law Firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP
29 November 2005
- Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP Announces That the Class Period in the Shareholder Action Filed Against First BanCorp Has Been Extended
29 November 2005
- Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP Announces That the Class Period in the Shareholder Action Filed Against Motive, Inc. Has Been Extended
29 November 2005
- Berger & Montague, P.C. Client Files Class Action Against Bayou Hedge Fund Entities, Citibank, Hennessee Group, Sterling Stamos Capital Manageme
24 November 2005
- Schatz & Nobel, P.C. Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. -- WOLF
24 November 2005
- Nickel Ltd Files Second Lawsuit Against Pure Bioscience for $22 Million
24 November 2005
- Federman & Sherwood Announces that a Securities Class Action Has Been Filed Against Motive, Inc.
20 November 2005
- Baron & Budd Announces the Filing of a Class Action Suit Against Blockbuster, Inc., National Amusements, Inc. and Viacom, Inc. and Certain of Their Cu
18 November 2005
|