Legal Action News

Your news source for lawsuits and other civil legal matters

Legal Action Recently...

April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004


Legal Action News RSS Feed
RSS Feed



 

Motorists Worry about Faulty Red Light and Speed Cameras As Ohio Politicians Debate a Ban

1 November 2005

City officials claim they are adding red light enforcement cameras as fast as possible in an effort to reduce accidents, and with the hope of collecting millions in new revenue – ignoring problems reported all over the country.

Legislators are debating a ban on the cameras, and motorists are turning to PhotoBlocker (tm) spray as a form of self-defense against cameras that have been proven wrong thousands of times.

All across the country there are continuos media reports of red light and speed camera systems that make errors. Innocent motorists are getting tickets when they should not. The cost of fighting the faulty tickets is high because of lost time from work and legal fees, and the assumption by courts that the cameras do not make mistakes.

Although many just pay the fine and move on with life, some have banded together to fight, resulting in some cities refunding fines costing taxpayers millions. A story in the Toledo Blade reported that 43 percent of drivers who go through the trouble to appeal speed camera tickets succeed in getting the ticket dismissed.

Official studies have been conducted that show the best way to reduce accidents at intersections is to lengthen the duration of the yellow light, but that method does not produce revenue so cities are opting for the camera systems instead. A study in Washington, D.C. shows that accidents at intersections have dramatically increased with the addition of the cameras. Drivers panic when they see the red light camera and hit the brakes, which often causes a rear end collision.

While politicians debate the merits of the program and fight over banning the cameras, motorists are taking action to protect themselves from the faulty tickets.

“Drivers resent getting tickets they do not deserve. The cost in time and money to defend themselves is excessive, so they would rather use PhotoBlocker (tm) spray to save money by preventing the unjust tickets. We want our roads to be safe, and we do not encourage anyone to break the law. But we know how frustrating it is to get a ticket you do not deserve,” explained Joe Scott of PhotoBlocker.com.

PhotoBlocker (tm) is a simple aerosol spray that when applied to a license plate does not in any way alter the appearance of the plate to the naked eye, but the flash picture from a red-light camera or speed camera makes the number on the plate unreadable.

As more and more errors and problems are reported in the news, the demand for cans of PhotoBlocker (tm) spray continues to rise. The company reports sales of over 350,000 cans protecting over 1 million vehicles in 23 countries. The product is available from many local distributors, retail outlets, and over the Internet at http://www.PhotoBlocker.com.

“We get calls, e-mails and letters from many professionals who are very happy with the effectiveness of PhotoBlocker spray. Journalists, doctors, lawyers, firefighters, teachers, and judges themselves have resorted to using PhotoBlocker spray to avoid entrapment,” said Scott.

Contact:
Joe Scott
703-624-9318
joe.scott@phantomplate.com

Press release services by http://ThatPRGuy.com

Source: The Open Press


All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.


Related Articles


 
Law News



A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z