Florida Regulator Flaunts Law, Seeks to Impose Credit Rule
24 May 2006 The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation is making an end run around Florida law by seeking to implement a credit-based insurance scoring rule that is currently being challenged in state court, according to the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. The OIR notified insurers that it intends to enforce the provisions of the controversial rule effective Sept. 1. The rule was originally proposed in 2004 to implement the provisions of legislation enacted in 2003 that is based on the National Conference of Insurance Legislators model insurance scoring act. The proposal went beyond the requirement of the law by requiring insurers to document the affects of insurance against demographic information not collected by, or available to, insurers. In March 2005, PCI, and other insurance trade associations filed suit against the Department of Financial Services, Office of Insurance Regulation and the Financial Services Commission. The petition challenged the specific provisions of the rule as contrary to statute, and also addressed the fact that, following reorganization of the Department of Financial Services, the OIR relied on statute for promulgating the rule that did not give the OIR the authority to do so. "This is an illegal act that is unenforceable," William Stander, PCI assistant vice president and regional manager, said. "It is a sad day when the state's regulatory body flaunts the authority of the legal system and runs roughshod over due process rights. We will do everything possible to prevent them from enforcing this illegal rule." Florida's law is in the mainstream regarding how states regulate insurers' use of credit information. But with the OIR interpretation, Florida is in essence banning insurance scoring by making compliance extraordinarily difficult, if not impossible. The rule would require insurers to demonstrate that the use of the credit-based information does not have a disproportionate affect on "persons of any race, color, religion, marital status, age, gender, income, national origin, or place of residence. However, studies have been conducted that demonstrate that insurance scores are objective and when used along with other familiar factors such as driving record and the age of a home or type of vehicle, help provide a clearer picture of an individual's risk of loss. This helps insurers personalize the insurance coverage by more accurately pricing the policies based on the individual policyholder's potential for filing a claim. "The bottom line is that insurance scoring helps to lower insurance premiums for most consumers, which makes insurance coverage more available and affordable," Stander said. "This rule does not protect consumers; it harms them by violating the law and disrupting the marketplace."
Source: insurancejournal
All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.
Related Articles
- Shareholder Class Action Filed Against Escala Group, Inc. by the Law Firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP
24 May 2006
- Michigan Attorney General Cox Announces Corporate Integrity Agreement with Metron Nursing Home Chain
24 May 2006
- New No Cost Law Practice Management eCourse Debuts -- Reducing Attorney Work Hours While Attorney Increasing Revenues
24 May 2006
- Immigration Judge Joins New York Law Firm
23 May 2006
- Personal Attorney Service Launches Electronic Filing in California Superior Courts
23 May 2006
- Attorney Alan Becker Authors Guide to Personal, Professional and Financial Fulfillment
23 May 2006
- Investor Update: The Rosen Law Firm Reminds Investors About Upcoming Deadline in the Class Action Lawsuit Against Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. --
21 May 2006
- American Jewish Congress Council for World Jewry Labels Iran's Holocaust-Mimicking Clothing Law a Head Long Retreat to Dark Ages
21 May 2006
- Fundraiser for Bethany Hospital Blasted as Hoax, West Siders Protest Posh Downtown Event; Will File Complaint with Attorney Gen.
21 May 2006
- Guatemala Attorney General Faces Criminal Charges for Cover-up
21 May 2006
- Class Action Filed Against American International Group, Inc. by the Law Firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP on Behalf of Purchasers of Franklin Templet
21 May 2006
- Prepared Remarks of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales at the Project Safe Childhood Implementation Launch
18 May 2006
- A Reminder for Investors by the Pomerantz Law Firm -- Lead Plaintiff Deadline is May 22, 2006 in Class Action Against Merge Technologies -- MRGE
18 May 2006
- Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox Announces Identity Theft Charges Against Two Nursing Home Employees
17 May 2006
- Tax Attorney Steven D. O'Connell Joins Damon, Topham & Company, LLC
17 May 2006
|