Australia Needs Consistent Uniform National Abortion Laws To Protect Women and Doctors
22 August 2005 Dr Haikerwal said the prosecution of the doctor for terminating the pregnancy within the 21-24 week period has huge repercussions for Australian women and doctors and the broaderAustralia community.
?This case creates great uncertainty and confusion?and fear,? Dr Haikerwal said.
?All the State and Territory Governments must clarify their laws on abortion in consultation the AMA, the whole medical profession and the public. There is a leadership role for the Federal Government, too, given its recent efforts in stirring up the abortion debate. Australia ?The AMA is concerned that a situation could arise where doctors could be compromising patient care for fear of legal repercussions.
?Any decision on abortion is between the doctor and patient. There is no place for third parties - governments, over-zealous politicians andlawyers, hospital committees, or even the Australiaspectre of legal action.
?The decision for late term abortion is not made lightly by women or the doctors who care for them.
?Doctors need to be working in a safe and clear legal environment. It is not acceptable for doctors and their patients to not know what is required for an abortion to be considered legal.
?Australia urgently needs uniform national legislation on abortion so that access to services is safe and equitable for all Australian women,? Dr Haikerwal said.
Dr Haikerwal said the inconsistencies and confusion about abortion law from State to State to Territory were clearly set out in an article last year in the Medical Journal of Australia. In the August 2004 MJA article, ?Abortion: time to clarify Australia's cAustraliaonfusing laws?, L J de Crespigny and J Savulescu explain that:
* The ACT is only jurisdiction where abortion has been removed from criminal statutes
* WA clarified its abortion laws in 1998 but only after two doctors were charged with unlawful abortion
* Abortion laws are unclear and complex and vary from State to State. In Victoria, an abortion is not ?unlawful? if a doctor believes that the abortion is necessary to preserve the woman's life or her physical or mental health
* Committees have been established in hospitals and elsewhere to consider abortion, which further intrudes into the doctor-patient relationship
Laws in four jurisdictions are still based on an 1861 English law - the Offences against the Person Act. Laws place obstacles in the way of women seeking abortion, making doctors the gatekeepers. ?This exposes Australian women and their doctors to unacceptablelegal risks and doctors to unacceptable professional risks?, the authors say.
Source: I-Newswire
All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.
Related Articles
- Law Offices Of Charles J. Piven, P.A. Announces Class Action Lawsuit
20 August 2005
- Trumpet Marketing Group, LLC Announces New Legal Resource, AllThingsLegal.com
19 August 2005
- Research and Markets: International Intellectual Property Law Is an Indispensable Primer for Businesses and Attorneys
8 August 2005
- Law Offices Of Charles J. Piven, P.A. Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Majesco Entertainment Company
24 July 2005
- ‘Blawgs’ Little More than an Expensive Hobby for Many Law Firms.
23 July 2005
- Statement from Microsoft Regarding Legal Action Against Google and a Former Executive
21 July 2005
- Collusion Between Lawyers and Judges Rampant In U.S. Court System
9 July 2005
- National Law Firm Assures Prescribing Doctors They Will Not Be Sued
8 July 2005
- Law Offices of Brian M. Felgoise, P.C. Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against ConAgra Foods, Inc.
23 June 2005
- Law Offices of Brodsky & Smith, LLC Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Possis Medical, Inc.
6 June 2005
- Legal Files 6.0 Offers Expanded Integration, Increased Data Portability
30 May 2005
- Law Offices of Brian M. Felgoise, P.C. Announces Class Action Lawsuit
24 May 2005
- Consumer Advocacy Group Joins Forces with Law Firm
23 May 2005
- Human Science Systems Retains Intellectual Property Law Firm
18 May 2005
- Napoli Bern (formerly Napoli, Kaiser & Bern) Law Firm Active in “Toxic’ Pit Lawsuit against CSX Transportation
6 May 2005
|