Legal Action News

Your news source for lawsuits and other civil legal matters

Legal Action Recently...

April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004


Legal Action News RSS Feed
RSS Feed



 

Australia Needs Consistent Uniform National Abortion Laws To Protect Women and Doctors

22 August 2005

Dr Haikerwal said the prosecution of the doctor for terminating the pregnancy within the 21-24 week period has huge repercussions for Australian women and doctors and the broaderAustralia community.

?This case creates great uncertainty and confusion?and fear,? Dr Haikerwal said.

?All the State and Territory Governments must clarify their laws on abortion in consultation the AMA, the whole medical profession and the public. There is a leadership role for the Federal Government, too, given its recent efforts in stirring up the abortion debate.
Australia
?The AMA is concerned that a situation could arise where doctors could be compromising patient care for fear of legal repercussions.

?Any decision on abortion is between the doctor and patient. There is no place for third parties - governments, over-zealous politicians andlawyers, hospital committees, or even the Australiaspectre of legal action.

?The decision for late term abortion is not made lightly by women or the doctors who care for them.

?Doctors need to be working in a safe and clear legal environment. It is not acceptable for doctors and their patients to not know what is required for an abortion to be considered legal.

?Australia urgently needs uniform national legislation on abortion so that access to services is safe and equitable for all Australian women,? Dr Haikerwal said.

Dr Haikerwal said the inconsistencies and confusion about abortion law from State to State to Territory were clearly set out in an article last year in the Medical Journal of Australia. In the August 2004 MJA article, ?Abortion: time to clarify Australia's cAustraliaonfusing laws?, L J de Crespigny and J Savulescu explain that:

* The ACT is only jurisdiction where abortion has been removed from criminal statutes

* WA clarified its abortion laws in 1998 but only after two doctors were charged with unlawful abortion

* Abortion laws are unclear and complex and vary from State to State. In Victoria, an abortion is not ?unlawful? if a doctor believes that the abortion is necessary to preserve the woman's life or her physical or mental health

* Committees have been established in hospitals and elsewhere to consider abortion, which further intrudes into the doctor-patient relationship

Laws in four jurisdictions are still based on an 1861 English law - the Offences against the Person Act. Laws place obstacles in the way of women seeking abortion, making doctors the gatekeepers. ?This exposes Australian women and their doctors to unacceptablelegal risks and doctors to unacceptable professional risks?, the authors say.

Source: I-Newswire


All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.


Related Articles


 
Law News



A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z